Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
双重人格的形成，如果片子不是定型为恐怖片，也许蛋里孵出蛋是个“王子”守护小女孩
挺好看的，父亲挺der啊，就是个酱油！希望有第二部！
❤︎⌁⋆春水初生，春林初盛，春风十里，不如你。
再次，怪鸟宝宝的样子又萌又可爱，那双大眼睛像《指环王》中的咕噜姆。很恶心的就是怪鸟宝宝只吃女主的呕吐物，为了喂养怪物，女主每次都要呕吐。还有，怪物开始不断趋同女主，顺从女主的黑暗心理开始为非作歹，直到完全取代女主。
片子还行。倒是看崔武成演了这么多次配角，这是最好的一次。
拍的挺有感觉，演技都挺到位，但剧情真的拉。
这世上成功的人不是最优秀的人的人，而是混蛋。
还有《莫比亚斯》55：18报纸说：犀牛人逍遥法外。
看得一头雾水，应该不是我一个人觉得逻辑混乱。
就没见过那个黑帮，像男主这样，动不动就双眼湿润……用力过猛
不是，这片子只有6.3分认真的吗？拍的感觉相当对味啊！！！
小女孩又漂亮又善良 演得不错 可以说妈妈才是怪胎 撞方向盘那里淋漓尽致…妈妈她心中只有自己
这种恐怖片的路子不错，恐怖感可以和日常生活隔绝开来
脑洞开的比较大 那妈心理真是扭曲…还有为什么恐怖片里每个狗子的结局都这么惨啊😅
社长、会长、头目、混混各方势力，劲儿全用脑子上了。男主亲手把身边爱的、信任的、熟悉的东西通通送到地狱，然后高处不胜寒，孤家寡人一个，苟延残喘，不好。
电影结局：孩子应有的天性被父母误杀。剩下的是另一个不伦不类的自己，来迎接新的世界。
非常棒！恐怖和心理的分量恰到好处，结合的也恰到好处，女孩无助的绝望贯穿始终，不知为什么，看的时候心里一直有一种冲动，希望鸟把除女主外的所有人全部吃掉
哪来的热血，哪来的激情，看了个寂寞！！之前有本类似的韩片，也是讲好兄弟互杀的就比这部好看多了！
家庭环境中生出来的怪物。想要抛弃掉的那部分的令人恐惧的我，实在是跟母亲更像，其实是同一个我，只是在最后这形式和比例更加精妙，也铸造了更“完美”更能让母亲满意的我。
3.5分 尔虞我诈 最后只能被迫无奈认清事实 做到最大 好像年纪大了 看不了这种刀子捅来捅去 感觉真的好痛 最后复仇般杀了该杀的人 却没明白怎么又杀了要保护的人……
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
