Exploring the role and symbolic meaning of the Crown Jewels in the centuries-old coronation ceremony, The Coronation shows these objects of astonishing beauty in new high-resolution footage. The film tells the extraordinary story of St Edward's Crown, which was destroyed after the English Civil War and remade for the Coronation of Charles II in 1661. It has only been worn by Her Majesty once, at the moment she was crowned.
On 2 June 1953, on one of the coldest June days of the century and after 16 months of planning, The Queen set out from Buckingham Palace to be crowned at Westminster Abbey, watched by millions of people throughout the world. A ceremony dating back more than a thousand years was to mark the dawn of a new Elizabethan age.
Viewing both private and official film footage, The Queen recalls the day when the weight of both St Edward's Crown and the hopes and expectations of a country recovering from war were on her shoulders, as the nation looked to their 27 year-old Queen to lead them into a new era.
In the film, The Queen says: 「I've seen one Coronation, and been the recipient in the other, which is pretty remarkable.」
For audiences unfamiliar with the story of the Crown Jewels and the regalia, the film explains their contemporary relevance to the UK as a nation and to the enduring purpose and the work of monarchy. They are symbols of the relationship between the Sovereign and the people, and the duties and responsibilities of leadership.
The film also features eyewitness accounts of those who participated in the 1953 Coronation, including a maid of honour who nearly fainted in the Abbey, and a 12 year-old choirboy who was left to sing solo when his overwhelmed colleagues lost their voices.
ps：这部片子让我感觉像是《罗马》那个孩子出生后的续～
But nothing is happening!
Mike Mills的片子总是如此，影像质感十分出众，但是气质又相对独立，以至于在颁奖季会显得有些曲高和寡。但anyway，说不上为什么，静静看完，明明似乎什么都没有说，却觉得获得了某种疗愈。至少在当下，personally，我很需要这样一部片子。也是我今年颁奖季目前最喜欢的一部片子。
像是用剧情片的方式拍纪录片，让人关注年轻一代人如何看待未来，这个问题在当下的背景很有意义。而且拍摄选择了美国可能最没有未来的城市。华金仿佛已经成为美国颓废loser男人的代表，他演的角色怎么这样让人感同身受。
比较失望，非常平庸的片子。将近两个小时下来，角色发展和塑造没有达到预期，台词平平无奇甚至有些刻意。华金演谁都像小丑。这可以说是一部方方面面都十分平庸的电影，找不出来过多的毛病，但也没什么亮点。
一如既往的离谱但还算是蛮好看的（本作笑点被警视厅承包了hh
犯人出场五分钟基本就能猜到，最后还是靠足球和皮带拯救世界
如果小朋友们是真纪录片还蛮有趣的，A24式的美国现代城市自白。华金凤和小男孩还挺有爱的
通篇的客观镜头，能相对应缝合的主观镜头，有且也只有“摄像机”的所谓主观，但能被称为“真实”的规则绝非真实电影那种蹩脚的规律，一经失败就完全排中，每个接受采访的孩子都是相似，而没有什么共通的共相，彼此之间的家族类似恰好就是一个家庭中叔侄之间关系的映射。
过程还行，高潮部分失望。期待一下明年的琴酒吧
883｜3.5，采访美国一堆小孩，却还是带不了自己侄子；看似开放实则封闭的内心，通过体验自己妹妹的生活才彻底打开。其实挺老套，宏大议题的讨论和故事本身基本脱节，但透露出的温情非常打动人。黑白摄影+声画分离的剪辑+舒缓的配乐都是加分项。
犯人出场五分钟基本就能猜到，最后还是靠足球和皮带拯救世界
Mike Mills的片子总是如此，影像质感十分出众，但是气质又相对独立，以至于在颁奖季会显得有些曲高和寡。但anyway，说不上为什么，静静看完，明明似乎什么都没有说，却觉得获得了某种疗愈。至少在当下，personally，我很需要这样一部片子。也是我今年颁奖季目前最喜欢的一部片子。
有种奇妙的矛盾感的电影。1.小男孩眼神空洞，像有着老者的灵魂，但又简单纯真。他validate emotion的常识，甚至比大多数成年人还多，但我又在想本是玩泥巴的年纪，知道这些究竟是好还是坏，本片也不回避，最后通过问答给出了“会比爸爸好”的答案，也算是叙事完整吧。2.全片一直在说要express feelings，但是电影却选择了压抑的黑白色调，导演必定有他的想法，无谓对错。美学确实足够，尤其是光线从窗户外照进植物上，美极了。
最近看的最爱的一部。感觉中年人都或多或少背负了好多故事，与家人、恋人、社会关系等等。而孩子会受到家庭带来的影响。用类似纪录片的视角，温柔的呈现了中年人和小大人之间相互治愈过程，看得几度落泪。
Your typical nice looking, "heart warming" A24 flick...unrealistically precocious kid paired with confused middle-aged man and through turbulence and conflicts they gradually learn from each other and cherish the experience forever --- I have seen this one many times before. The "it's okay to yell, and then yelling out loud" scene in particular is soooo much of a cliche. Cinematography is alright but not really impressive, watching this back to back with Red Rocket the difference is so obvious (ok B&W is at disadvantage but still).The interview bits aren't integrated organically into the story, and it feels like the feel-good, "heartfelt" material got mixed in just for audience appeal.
Mike Mills的片子总是如此，影像质感十分出众，但是气质又相对独立，以至于在颁奖季会显得有些曲高和寡。但anyway，说不上为什么，静静看完，明明似乎什么都没有说，却觉得获得了某种疗愈。至少在当下，personally，我很需要这样一部片子。也是我今年颁奖季目前最喜欢的一部片子。
save and warm，peace and love
选角太好（Don’t come to New Orleans if you just want to see something different
Nothing to do with the movie
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
