A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
【B】观感挺不错，杰克吉伦哈尔的演技进步太多了。音效制作和节奏都把控得很棒，特别是音效代入感很强，全片都在调动观众情绪。
不怎么震撼，疫情下的作品，什么时候出伸冤人3呢？
人物情感很扎实，但还是有一种“that’s it?” 的感觉
多一颗给男主吧 broken people save broken people
落魄之人拯救落魄之人，拯救了他，也救了自己。其实这个命题也不新鲜了，电影本身的精彩度有限，这样的叙事可能小说更加意味深长。作为电影，拍摄手法聚焦在男主的演技之上，估计是朝着最佳男主的目标去的。
落魄之人拯救落魄之人
杰克的个人秀，结局较原作稍有改动，倒也挺符合当下的美国。
暴躁警察老哥的自我救赎/近两年声音叙事的片子越来越多了/猜测被误杀的小孩是黑人/吉伦哈尔演技确实能撑住一整场虽然没太多变化
男主人设实在不讨喜。结局圆满又正确，好莱坞潜规则兜兜转转又回去了（以前要正确结尾，有段时间变成要坏人赢，现在又轮回去了）
人物情感很扎实，但还是有一种“that’s it?” 的感觉
还算有意思的惊悚小品，上一次看Gyllenhaal演惊悚电影还是the prisoner，很高级的摄影和剪辑。此片是独幕独角戏，摄影就全剩下近景和特写，Jake的表演虽然撑得起这种拍摄方法不过也略显吃力，紧张的氛围渲染地不错。
得力于原作文本的强大和美国电影工业的发达，这部作品几乎是复制了原作，但音效和布景的提升把一部文艺片也成功打造成了商业电影。不过就质量来说，化简为繁反而成了立意的阻碍#吉伦哈尔的演出真是卖力，但原版的角色无论发型和情绪控制都要更胜一筹
吉克吉伦哈尔的独角戏，虽然是翻拍，但主演的戏剧张力丝毫不输原版，可以列为表演课的鉴赏节目，不过这个故事确实没有啥能吸引人的地方，反转也一般
翻拍的不如原版，即使有杰克吉伦哈尔这张脸和卖力表演，也非常不好看，简直就是一个躁郁症的911接线员和一个精神病在电话里刮躁了90分钟，看的脑壳疼…2.5
这几年看过叙事最抓人的片子了 全片只有一个场景 十几个角色都没露脸 都是通过电话塑造人物形象和故事 最后反转反转再反转
三星半。Jake的独角戏，全程只有他，还拉特写怼脸拍，观众只能靠他的表演和电话那头声音来判断故事的推展，基本处于和接线员一样的视角，有意思。Jake真的演什么都很稳。
喜欢这样的个人秀，纯演技发挥，没有看过丹麦原作，但并不影响观赏本片，各种配音绝了，都是超强发挥。。。
6.2分，主要还是依靠于吉伦哈尔的演技。剧作以及视听呈现方式在原作时就已经惊艳过了，难免疲劳。
Broken people save broken people.
演技倒是不错，就是这主角又爱管自己又不上，一个劲到处指挥别人做事，脾气还大，看得好烦。太过政治正确，又在影射美国警察开枪打死黑人罪犯了么？
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
