剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 左安顺 3小时前 :

    #2022 TPFF 好看 多年前的一場案件不僅是回溯還是去翻案,各種權力展開來都方方面面拍攝到,那種無力回天之感又持續其中,分鏡的轉換異常絲滑,最後法庭戲的不斷逼問實在是好到揪心,唯一優點美中不足的是完了期待近乎完整呈現而奉獻出的近3h時長

  • 戈哲圣 3小时前 :

    3.5 剧本扎实情绪密集的波兰学院派,向观众抛出了一团关于权力与暴力如何在媾和中消灭正义与公平、体制如何肆无忌惮施压去磨灭个体的精神与诉求、犬儒如何成为帮凶去隐瞒和篡改良心的黑暗世界。在记录历史和启示现实上这种激烈的纪实有一定作用,当然作为电影,它的揭露沉重得太密不透风,并没有留给观者一个喘息的出口。

  • 堵雅容 9小时前 :

    被强权盯上到底有多惨,当权者不是耗死你就是弄死你,手段可谓是是无奇不有,怎么不要脸怎么来,这种情况下我们能做些什么呢?

  • 支晓莉 6小时前 :

    “我这里天气晴好。”

  • 令景福 4小时前 :

    我,一个可以看闷片下饭的影迷,被这部片子打败了:一般所谓的“慢电影”,无论是情绪的慢,氛围的慢,都是镜头所指向的语言和动作要有意义的慢——而不是眨一下眼用一秒钟,低一下头用三秒钟,说一句话停顿五秒钟这样木讷的慢——这电影慢的这半拍,让人着急,让人心塞,慢的无聊,慢的没意义,稀释了剧情,消解了共情,用1.25倍速看惊人的正常,哪怕1.5倍速也没什么不适感——所以,导演你怎么了?平时也这么无精打采吗??

  • 卫军 2小时前 :

    一部有关人工智能的荒诞室内剧。因为反对人类的人工智能尤尼克斯构成威胁,居家人工智能将几家人关到防护严密的屋内。虽然在居家机器人的帮助下,逃出了时冷时热的屋子,但遭到尤尼克斯的围堵,在千钧一发之际,尤尼克斯首领的一个失误,导致无人机将所有的尤尼克斯全部清除,人类得以幸存。

  • 振栋 1小时前 :

    挺有趣的呀,至少电影一开始就能吸引我看下去。

  • 实奇颖 4小时前 :

    我猜,并不好看,晚上试试,晚上试了下,果然还是不行

  • 仲幼怡 0小时前 :

    有点不知所云,但导演对中国文化历史,感觉还是懂一点的哈哈

  • 俊钰 2小时前 :

    主题岂止是陈旧 说一句考古也不为过,再瞅一眼导演的名字,更闹心了……

  • 亥文姝 8小时前 :

    政治宣传作品,跟现在波兰现在偷俄罗斯天然气一样,西方婊子又当又立

  • 亥盈盈 0小时前 :

    正反两方,优劣势的反转也来得太猝不及防了吧。开始,从舆论到民情再到司法,都占尽优势,对于怎么棍棒底下生转折的交代,也实在太不充分,可片子却又能在努力营建却不至于有信服力的阴霾氛围中,冗长拖至160分钟。

  • 明栀 5小时前 :

    熟悉的配方、熟悉的味道、熟悉的场景、熟悉的事、熟悉的人——太阳之下,永无新鲜之事;鸡权之下,无人可免于恐惧。

  • 凯禧 6小时前 :

    政治宣传作品,跟现在波兰现在偷俄罗斯天然气一样,西方婊子又当又立

  • 初雪 5小时前 :

    我觉得大海之所以美丽是因为它能够藏起秘密,两个美少女同框的画面真的好美,3116的演技真的不行,虽然也是我喜欢的年轻男孩的模样,有几个瞬间真的挺像松下的~

  • 堂飞白 2小时前 :

    波兰的孙志刚案,奶一个最佳剧本和奥提。大量的室内对话戏,分镜看得出导演极其学院派的功底,近三个小时的长度,没有任何可以指摘的地方——但这也是这类题材作品的遗憾之处

  • 明嫔然 2小时前 :

    法国人的幽默…本以为是一部科幻片,谁知道在讲老套的人工智能和人类的相亲相爱

  • 掌碧莹 3小时前 :

    讽刺内核的电影,色彩饱和度很强,观影感舒适。

  • 摩巧曼 4小时前 :

    再宽容也忍不住差评 烂到令人发指 令人无时无刻后悔观影所浪费的时间 靠滨边美波和百合隐喻的海报把人骗进来折磨 3倍速都嫌无聊 片子的每分每秒都狂喊着编、导无能

  • 匡浩波 6小时前 :

    重复多少次都白费口舌的真相 无法跟捂着耳朵的人讲道理

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved