Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
当你能自己找到欢愉的时候，你就不再需要他了，人无论多大年纪都要成长和改变啊。
节奏掌握得真好，喜剧和正剧之间的切换时机都恰到好处。对话也写得超棒，触到痛处的地方戳两下收一下，绕出去一圈再突然回来戳一下。短小精悍的100分钟，有笑有泪有思考，一切都刚刚好。
好真诚的话剧电影，男女主的化学反应很妙，对白和互动让人数度落泪… 女性意识觉醒之后的自信和自爱真的会发光~ Leo这样的Public Service上哪儿领？
good luck to me，and all of us
很感动！开始感觉可能有点闹腾，而且因为每个演员都担任了好几个角色，会有点错位的诧异感。不过最后那种厚重感和爱的传递的正能量还是传达到了，尤其是从那些人起飞离开后开始，那种怅然若失，挺戳人的。
我当然同意绝大多数人都需要高质量的性体验，但我还是不能苟同赋予性交易合法性的必要，虽然人的身体自古以来总是被当作商品用来交易，可是人的身体不应该被当作商品用来交易，哪怕在这个作品里性交易显得挺美好也不行
好像看现场啊。完全想不到的切入点，演员都演得非常棒。尤其女机长独唱那一段，太励志了。
▫️影片后半段两人的冲突，乍看觉得莫名其妙接受不了，细想其实也再自然不过，无法把情欲和亲密感情剥离，是女主循规蹈矩人生的一部分，对于这次“一生中唯一的冒险”也自然而然的想在这条轨道上运行。而“相互救赎”非要让男主也来个转变就实属鸡汤了。
有种尺度更大一点牛郎版爱在系列电影的感觉，单纯的就两个角色，在很小的空间里发生一个简单的故事。如果电影故事没有用三次约会，而是用一次约会就深化所有的主题，这样会更厉害。当然让一个55岁的宗教学老师去一步一步面对自己的欲望，哪怕对方是小鲜肉也不会那么快就卸下所有的防备吧，但是还是觉得用三幕稍微有点普通。爱玛·汤普森也老了，但是片中她依旧魅力十足，最后一场戏对着自己的身体欣赏的戏份升华了主题，不要焦虑，不要焦虑，不要焦虑，要接受自己，哪怕是已经下垂的自己。而更应该在任何年纪都要正视自己的欲望，包括但不限于性的欲望、被爱的欲望，正是这些“杂念”重新定义了每一个人。
温暖的故事。这部音乐剧演员好辛苦啊，全程扮演不同人物唱歌、还要搬道具、换衣服。
好极了。全程都看到母亲的影子，因为我有时就怀疑自己是她为了按部就班完成任务打勾生的，选择看不见或假装不知道或自己骗自己就以为孩子遵守着她的道德传统。希望她也能为自己活几天，不是作为妻子，不是作为母亲，只是作为女人。
最令人称赞的是舞台设计，这么简单的 呈现形式讲了一个温情的真实故事，体现了导演的能力。
真好。卸下枷锁，赤裸相见，做爱，做人吧。喜欢配乐，喜欢摄影，喜欢艾玛汤普森勇敢地真实地露出身体。
各方面都很出色的一部片，就今年看过的片子，它的精彩甚至不输给妈的宇宙。希望大家都可以任性地选择爱自己多一点，以及多给自己挣（攒）钱
这就是大陆永远不会引进的东西 很幸运做为人文学生在这个国家看到这种题材的片子 迄今为止在odeon看到的场次人最满的一场
一方面过于直白，缺少非语言的电影美。一方面意识形态过度小清新，干嘛用那么多话语淹没做爱，你们在害怕什么🤔口交完内裤穿回去、还有结尾那小小的性高潮都好假。
百老汇原版原本会在2020年4月在天桥上演，疫情原因演出取消，舞台影像记录了2021年在百老汇的重演。
Emma Thompson 演的也太好了，男主有点接不住。结局最后的镜头完美！
I'm an islander. 纽芬兰岛Gander小镇。喜欢女机长的故事，原型是 Beverley Bass, the first woman captain for American Airlines. "And the one thing I loved more than anything was used as the bomb" 真是听着很让人心痛。
在糖衣包裹的梦幻之后又拔高到另一个层面了。普通人能够共情的角度太多，说教的态度又非常温和，看到的现实都变得有些浪漫了起来。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
