Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
“总有一天，大家会分道扬镳，然后还会交到更多更多的新朋友，你懂不懂啊？——我完全听不懂啦，我只知道要把握当下！ ”蜡笔小新涉及到的价值观总会让人惊喜。
可能展现了表层的二元对立和对于标准化的迎合，但是有关局限与定义的苦衷，面对更宽视野和更多角度，它仍旧重要吗……
做精英的人生怎样 一直胡闹的人生又怎样 我野原新之助只知道把握当下！
每年的某一天都会突然想：啊，去年的剧场版忘看了hhh。。开始还以为是黑镜style
是要做一个苦闷无趣的精英，还是享受当下酸甜苦辣的青春？😭拒绝压抑的社会竞争吧😭如果精英是精致的利己、是机械化，那人生有什么意思。享受谜团重重的青春，及时行乐吧！😆
😅蜡笔小新所有的剧场版我都看过，这部真的不好看啊。我都不知道怎么能这么高分？
青春就是要享受当下啊，长大后曾经的朋友也许会渐去渐远，但我们都会记得
居然看完有点点感动，番长摘下面具真的好帅呀
该搞笑的时候搞笑，该正经的时候正经，该热血的时候热血，一切都是规规矩矩，没有差错。可是小新的剧情容量还是更适合几分钟的剧集呢，拍成电影的长度还真是有点冗长。还有就是，没有美伢的小新不是完整的！！
小新这种屎尿屁题材，最适合的还是小的动画剧集，各种日常叙事的调味品。拍成大电影就有点过于重口了。这就好比郭德纲还是适合说相声，你要是让他连着说4个小时于老爷子的事儿，也受不了。
剧场版从来都不会让人失望，紧跟时代，发人深省。
并不是说《花之天下》真的那么差，关于青春的呐喊依旧让人感慨，只是当电影妄图循着《大人帝国》的路子再收获一次成功，那就必然被人拿出来对比，并在对方里里外外自洽的圆满面前黯淡下去。
缺少了台词的幽默，没什么意思，5分钟弃剧。
原本看着评分很高，但也做好了失望的准备，却是一个大大大惊喜！熟悉的味道回来了！美伢和正南真的笑死了，马拉松时发问青春的那一段真的被打动到了。青春有阳光也有阴暗，当月潮可以对狰狞的自己说我超爱自己的时候，眼泪就开始哗哗哗停不住了，只有当世界不只有一种评判维度，才是幸福的根源。还是爱蜡笔小新。
只有蜡笔小新
注意不要摔倒了。
臺灣片名｜《蠟筆小新：謎案！天下春日部學院的怪奇事件》
原来是友情呀！没想到风间这么在意小新这个朋友，想和他上同一所小学呢！风间希望小新这个浑浑噩噩的小子能努力努力和自己一样优秀，不想因为上小学分道扬镳失去这个朋友，也不希望小新上了小学交了新朋友而忘记了他。但小新说的也很好呀，风间你就一直这么自以为是的活下去吧～ 两人的友谊真让人羡慕呢…… 青春万岁
（7）。悬疑类型片外壳下包裹的是关于成长的烦恼和青春物语，最动人的还是为了朋友不顾丑态，被人嘲笑的奔跑。不过悬疑部分显得羸弱。
版权归作者所有，任何形式转载请联系作者。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
