Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
演员最大的挑战，是演出自己。 噱头是属于他的生涯“救赎”（即使在我看来这早已在去年的《猪》还有更早的《曼迪》成功完成）和将所有质疑、光环与骂声都抛在一边的倾力演出，但同样也是自己对于相信的东西的持续承诺。加入很多让人津津乐道的彩蛋，在整个片长中始终饱满地填充着娱乐能量和讨喜的自我意识；以很多出色喜剧演员组成的配角演员阵容没得到充分利用是遗憾，但依然是足够欢乐、让人想参与其中的旅程。【SXSW今年的「Headliners」是个对演员充满奇迹的单元，之于杨紫琼，之于桑婆，之于凯奇。】
抗英神剧。慢镜头多到人想笑，这很印度片？！👬情很好磕(bushi)。
不知道印度是怎么建国的…反正看得很欢乐，欧耶~~✌🏻
抗英神剧。慢镜头多到人想笑，这很印度片？！👬情很好磕(bushi)。
这是一部神奇的影片，你看着看着不自觉地就想乐！看完，都特么要笑岔气了。
bheem，ram，sita
我不理解
而这种歌舞元素让他们的导演在动作和造型设计上面的功力尤其出众 值得借鉴
我们有抗日神剧，他们有抗英神剧。要颜有颜要肉有肉，特效起码值八毛钱的。就是太长。
印度抗英神片，经典祖传慢镜。平心而论娱乐性还凑合，三小时不觉得冗长。被男主一周吃一顿还坚持健身的精神深深打动。
片中英国兵的战斗力相当于我国手撕鬼子片里的日本兵，爽片，希望印度人用这样的片子培养出的感情能对准高加索人种的罪恶而不是和中国互掐。总督夫人演得好，把高加索人的傲慢与恶毒充分展示了出来。
又好笑又感动，因为爱电影，所有幼稚的行为，都可以变得热血。两位主角先后陷入又爱对方又不得不伤害对方的抉择，真的好有趣！两个老男人互相喜欢的故事，放在大陆真是想都不敢想，明明那么多题材可以做，也可以做得很有趣，可我们就总是以为观众不会爱看，有点可悲。
印度革命浪漫主义电影!
7.5分。
2.编剧、摄影、演技都不错，情节太雷，舞蹈有力，肌肉够强。
《RRR》
嘿嘿，还是挺猛的啊！印度的片近几年也有些火的趋势啊？就是没有看到我们国产的有什么大火的。
时间太长了，三个多小时。两个小时左右讲完就可以了。双男主身材真好，好莱坞的动作设计虽然夸张，但是观赏性并不差。7.1
印度电影受英雄史观影响太大了，两个主角靠冷兵器歼灭了一支装备精良的英军。两个人叠罗汉从数十米高的塔楼一跃而下平稳落地，主角徒手截停高速驰行的摩托车，还单手举起来了摩托，个人英雄主义色彩浓厚，三小时时长配有印度电影独有的尬舞
给特效的，最后打斗夸张了，那个箭一直没有减少怎么回事
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
