Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.
Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)
As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.
The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).
Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
全片最大亮点电子猫，索克斯…虽然是美队配音的buzz就是不喜欢啊…
属于看了开头就能知道结尾的类型。借着The toys的皮说了一个基本上毫无关联的宇航员故事，可以说是非常无聊了。
对皮克斯有些失望……
这不是一部多优秀的动画片，笑料、剧情、特效都很一般。但是情怀这个东西，你懂得………
我草！！！我看了个啥？？？？快30年了，第一次看我大皮克斯看不下去，这是个啥东西？？？这就是……andy为之兴奋不已，为之骄傲的买了巴斯光年的电影？？？
To the infinite and beyond. Buzz太孤独了
很有趣，我蛮喜欢的。可以说和玩具总动员没啥关系，路人感门槛也低。我很喜欢那机器猫那种机械感的喵喵喵。
Time dilation的概念延展到本片的编剧创作当中，故事的跳跃性加速了剧情发展，无法建立完善的世界观和厚实的人物关系，以至于可以走捷径随意地创作出一个毫无说服力可言的反派角色。同样对于文本内容毫推动力量的同性角色，与其说是Disney自诩倡导其包容多元化的理念，不如说是更加符合当下时代商业上的需求。
所有的衍生劇調低預期總沒錯，用幹掉自己來修正和成長有點過分了。
非常好的故事底子，但仓促的剧本浪费了它成为好电影的机会。如今的迪士尼除了圈钱已经没有了更高的追求了吗？
前面的飞行试验让我想起了飞屋环游记，可惜，之后的剧情一塌糊涂，反正我看我是不会想买巴斯的。
虽然动漫都低龄，但是这也太低龄了，除了画面感，其他的真看不下去。PS我还是《玩具总动员》系列的收藏老龄人，这《光年》我是昏昏入睡，3星给画面和怀旧分吧。
我们的敌人只有自己
『 5.0 前半部分可以说非常好看，但反派出来逻辑直接消失了，为所欲为（巴斯随便在宇宙飞来飞去，甚至还能超人式降落）迪士尼真的是打着皮克斯旗号招摇撞骗，顺便因为这么三秒的镜头（那段有点飞屋的感觉）让整部不能上映 』
宇宙，未来科技，飞船，机器人，矿石，能源，特别是那只可爱聪明的机器猫，这是一部处处充满了小朋友最爱的元素的电影。
反正我觉得挺好的，对于玩总粉来说或许会更好，故事其实挺简单的，不过元素较完整，该有的都有，就是穿越这个事吧，感觉多少有点小漏洞，结尾的有点急
很失望啊。冲着桃总去看的，但是这个动画还是给小孩子看的啊。一晃二十多年，巴斯已经不是记忆中的模样。
不喜欢这种猪队友剧情，让人捉急。
i rly thought this was going to be an inspirational film. 贪得无厌的我
只有那只机器猫好可爱。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
