Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
为了情怀给个四星吧 虽然感觉画风变了好多 而且按照剧版最后续缘的东方月初已经很老了 既然黑狐只是分身 富贵也杀了它 那么权潼后面发生的故事应该是面对真正的黑狐才让富贵转世的 猜测下一部就是权潼2了
狐妖作为国漫崛起的领军作品，本来就会做很多其他作品不敢的新尝试，这种时候我们更应该支持和鼓励，而不是一味地挑三拣四。
压力，对于每一个中年人来说都是无形的杀手；压力+一镜到底，更是让人窒息。
终于把我的月红拉出来溜溜了，死而无憾了，满足，嗝~
那个画质感人 ，还有东方月初那个腹肌真的辣眼睛 。 麻烦腾讯换回原来的制作公司好吗 ？
只能说画面真的对比起来差太多了，剧情衔接也没有月红篇好，还好不是洛水花原做的，加一星算支持狐妖吧
为了多看月红两眼才看的，结果全程画风崩出天际，还我美人！！
人物背景交代不够，废柴主厨一地鸡毛的一晚，亮点也就是真·一镜到底
还行吧，总体来说过于平淡吧，不过我觉得还可以吧。总归还是那两个字：还行。
故事有点快，很多事情都是几年前交代的了，要是能加入点之前的简要让大家温习一下就好了。画风也没有之前好看了，好像每个人脸都变长了，虽然老一辈的故事很有意思，但是还是希望能加速推动主线，狐妖加油！
2）并且这一个小时就讲了一件事儿，那就是交代了涂山红红与东方月初大战的缘由。会不会太单薄了啊。
无论是剧情还是制作水平都显得比较幼稚简单，如果原版动画也是这个水平那真对不起我一直以来对它的期待和注意，毕竟这种动画质量是担不起“国漫复兴”这个让人能热血冲动一番的称谓的。希望哪天有空看原番能狠狠打我脸证明我错了。
还真是惊悚片，看完容易和生活过不去，中年危机，人情世故那些乱七八糟的事一股脑的涌入，可我还是个孩子啊
3）一个小时的影片里很多画面都是原来的剧集出现过而且是一模一样的。可以理解是为了让观众回忆起之前的剧情并且串联上。但至少有15分钟也太长了吧！
有惊喜！！求婚告白什么的，我直接尖叫！！谢谢月红2圆梦，我宣布这一部成为我的国漫top1！
觉得整个过程像是煮开水般逐渐升温，不只是男主自己在面临失控局面，是片中每个人都焦躁不安，被客人嫌恶的女服务员等……
画风完全变了，剧情有点水，台词也很差。但是最后的BGM还是让人不禁泪流满面。
不知道为啥要改模型，有些丑了，画质稍微糊了些，倒是不影响观看体验，3+1星，没有惊喜，但是看的津津有味，解释了月红二人当初为啥决战，最后看的也是，难以自己，还是可以的，如果后续出类似的，还希望能多用用心，小红娘这么好的ip，实在是不想出现瑕疵，加油！！！一直爱小红娘
终于看到了月红的结局，其实苏苏就是失去记忆和妖力的红红吧。
很好，终于看到月红的结局了，漫画里没有的内容这里全有了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
