剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 帆静 7小时前 :

    虽然是个看了开头应该就知道结尾的故事,不过还是挺好看的。海兽的设定有点俗套了

  • 巫马天翰 7小时前 :

    前面还好 后面的逻辑就有点让人看不懂了 小红进到城里之后的部分就开始胡说八道了

  • 戎弘丽 5小时前 :

    今年看的制作比较精良的动画片了。女主有点像克里斯多福。

  • 介采珊 7小时前 :

    这个故事框架能找到很多之前看过的动画片的影子,整体像是「驯龙高手」加「海洋奇缘」的低配版,前二十分钟还是比较精彩的,而当小女孩出现之后,剧情就变得越来越没意思了,太老套不说,还没看到一半就已经猜到了故事结局。整体故事有些拖沓了,90分钟能讲完非要拖到接近两小时,倒是最后的结尾有些仓促了,本想会有彩蛋,讲一下之后发生的故事,居然没有!感觉又缺了点什么。整体来说,算是网飞出品的动画作品里还可以的了。

  • 双世敏 4小时前 :

    逻辑好薄弱,碰到一个亲人的海兽,也不代表能把所有其他海兽当宠物……我们没有海兽的普通地球,海洋里都有很多有威胁的生物。结尾靠着小女孩的嘴炮改变了一切?也太想当然的逻辑了,迪士尼公主看了都得摇头。

  • 储乐松 9小时前 :

    也许我已经不是这电影的受众了,认认真真的看,前面捕捉海兽过程还不错,后来小女孩上传到跟海兽做朋友太套路了。一会儿要做猎人,又立刻跟海兽做朋友,为啥最后一堆人听一个不满十岁的小孩儿说他们的历史都是编的啊?那个螃蟹海兽明明就是很凶恶啊!小女孩也没有考证啊!啥呀都是!乱七八糟的,太奇怪了,还想看一部类似大白鲨的捕猎动物的动画片呢,最后是个啥,就是为了个和谐的结局吗?

  • 寸爰美 1小时前 :

    画面三分剧情扣一分,天真善良大喊”I have every rights”的少女咱们就是说梦回“环保少女”了,不是说保护动物的主题不行,前期铺垫不少以为有什么大冲突高能剧情呢结果一顿嘴炮输出,突然就民众幡然醒悟敌方落荒而逃了???你们西方国家真这么无脑怎么现在又开始讨伐环保少女了捏🤪

  • 强运 6小时前 :

    不知道应该说他是低配版还是高配版的《驯龙高手》

  • 彬雨 9小时前 :

    从另一方面想,如果红色海兽代表CN一切似乎又说得通了。

  • 宗灿灿 5小时前 :

    组合了各路电影IP的招牌元素,让两小时的成片相当丰满;不仅仅是应接不暇的冒险,同样展示情感意义满载的成长路。但中间的唱段和最后的片尾演绎,都让人感觉如果有更多音乐的部分,会让气质更加出挑;稍显累赘的叙事进展,也有些破坏了考究画风所带来的片刻新鲜。Karl Urban的配音很有趣,与演员有足够信服的火花;拓展下去或许并非问题,说不定还能成就Netflix靠拿动画BP实现“曲线救国”。

  • 振澄 1小时前 :

    完全不知所云。

  • 卞若淑 5小时前 :

    3.5 森山未来演的真好,驾驭了25年的时间跨度,喜欢他的气质,剧情本身和编排并不出彩。

  • 向晴岚 9小时前 :

    人物造型虽然丑,但是红黄蓝怪兽组合倒是分外养眼~

  • 岳帅奇逸 0小时前 :

    童话,在任何时候都可以给真实生活一剂强心针

  • 惠月 4小时前 :

    2022.7.25 主題非常清晰,清晰到顯得全片是寫砸了的命題作文,編出來的故事滿滿的草率蹩足交差感,硬拗得不講道理。看之前還以為是海上版how to train your dragon,結果也就差了2000個小黃人吧。唯一追得上的就是音樂了。

  • 卫舒尧 4小时前 :

    海兽和人类可以和平共处。没有什么比大团圆结局更好了

  • 包敏才 7小时前 :

    整体紧凑好看,画面明快活泼,不过最后小女主嘴炮感悟众人,打倒帝后,就有点像儿童闹剧啦

  • 任梦影 7小时前 :

    “我们的历史建立在谎言之上,都是他们编造的,为了他们的私欲”。敢于直面极权的只有靠最年轻的热血和最纯洁的心灵

  • 吉初 4小时前 :

    没想到美国人也拍这种主题先行的影片,结尾完全不切实际,就算是童话世界也完全不可能发生。唯一亮点是小蓝。

  • 庹涵蓄 3小时前 :

    驯龙高手海洋版。现实生活中一个政权哪儿有那么容易倒塌?不过《海兽猎人》用小孩子那般天真的糖水故事铸就了这么一个幻想。从书本教育控制到军备“竞争”,本片都浅尝辄止了一下。不能只将目光聚集在标配的蓝色小萌物和略显粗糙但可爱的大怪兽设计身上,看看那光,那毛发,那水,好莱坞对这些元素的CG动画技术运用越发成熟且逼真了。有几个挠的心痒痒的伏笔没有回收,男主小时候沉船,从身下游走的巨大可怕略带荧光色条纹的大海兽为何不再现身,而与极恶的魔头交易后,独眼大船长又会付出什么代价?

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved