Synopsis
"Falsely accused as the murderer of my own husband... Oh, the cruel machinations of fate!" A female teacher (Lee Yong-ae) gives shelter to an escaped convict, but her husband, misconstruing her intentions, reacts violently and accidentally stabs himself to death in the process. The teacher is charged with her husband's murder, but fortunately the prosecutor on the case is a former student of hers, of whom she had taken painstaking care when she was working at an elementary school. Remembering her kindness to him, the prosecutor uncovers her innocence in court, and she is acquitted of the crime.
Notes
"A silent movie that allows us to examine the narrator-accompanied method of 16mm films" (Chung Jong-wha)
A Public Prosecutor and a Teacher is familiar to us for the performance of Shin Chool, Korea's last silent movie narrator (known as "byeonsa"in Korean). Numerous critics have recommended the film, praising it as "a silent movie that allows us to examine the narrator-accompanied method of 16mm films" (Chung Jong-wha), "the work of Korea's last silent movie narrator" (Kim Hong-joon), a movie that "reflects the public's consciousness and has great historical value" (Lee Seung-hun), and "the archetypal new-school film" (Chung Sung-il). As evidenced by such commentary, A Public Prosecutor and a Teacherenjoys greater recognition for its historical value as the only surviving silent movie in Korea than for its artistic or technical aspects. What is ironic is the fact that this recognition derivesfrom a production and screening method that fell behind the times, as sound films (or "talkies") had already become the norm when the movie was first made. Its inclusion in the list is therefore based on its historical, social context rather than on the film itself.
Afterword:
- Narrated by Shin Chool, who is known as Korea's last silent film narrator, A Public Prosecutor and a Teacherhas been screened at several film festivals since the latter half of the 1990s.
每次看印度的电影都可以看到不同的层面，这次传递了一个可怕的信息，我们的竞争对手在反思，而且是正向的（2022-1）
韩国有《辩护人》，印度有《杰伊比姆》，中国有……？
国产剧水平的节奏也没拖烂这个绝好的故事，天朝何时能有司法正义片？
（印度拍片的确是不行，胜在真实故事改编，正义居然真的战胜了邪恶，胜在能拍能放，一个喝恒河水的落后国家居然精神也能比我们领先？战狼不服。）
毫无疑问，印度至今存在着非常严重的性别歧视和种族歧视，甚至可以在这里用一个“最”字。但印度社会允许质疑的声音发出来，也允许挑战这些不公的个人英雄主义的存在，还允许人们揭开旧伤疤看一看它究竟长好了没有……这就是他们的希望所在！
看到后面热泪盈眶。人人生而平等，不畏强权，争取人权。
答:讲故事的能力，23＞3＞17。
这个社会意义得十颗星啊。超级英雄片的处理把一个非常沉重的社会议题变得偶尔迸发一点娱乐精神，三个小时看下来也不累，这样才能触达最广大的受众啊。广播质感也是杠杠的，印度电影有一手！
看的很难过，一是因为电影里所揭示的不公，二是因为我们无法揭露的不公。
一个魔幻现实吊炸天的原型故事就这么被总是“适时”响起的傻不拉几的激昂BGM和过度神化的视角拖了后腿，硬是整成了三流爽剧。亮点都在部落里了，看他们对于苦难的描述，仿佛永无休止的噩梦，不像是电影而是纪录片。神奇国度，诚不欺我。
印度不时就会冒出这样西方式主旋律的电影，或许说，一个社会进步到一定地步的时候都会有类似的反映同类现实的文艺作品，我们同样有过，只是之后的发展，各自不同吧。
印度真是个奇怪的地方，这种低种姓的案子，在有的国家压根儿就不会被受理，就更别提免费的良心律师了
印度电影因为受众原因，通常拍得很长（据说影院里好避暑），表现手法中规中矩，通俗易懂，艺术性一般。但也正因此，电影受众极广。印度民众对于心灵和社会问题的关注度与思辨爱好，千年邻居只能汗颜。
当你觉得世界病的不轻周围很多沙币的时候，这些历史上真实存在的人和真实发生的事，让你即使在漆黑的大海中央也能相信：这世界依然存在那样一类有神性的人，ta们的存在不为名、不为利，而是众生度尽、方证菩提。
真的是胜在真实事件本身的残酷与带来的意义，影片整体臃肿了些，是印度影片的的通病了，但还是看看吧，又一个需要罪.犯就造一个，至于是谁，不重要，弱势就行，但这样的事少吗？历史与现实会告诉你，司.法系统，法.律，执.法者，到底在保护谁？有一股势力想要逼迫绝大多数的人视野要更狭窄，知道得越少越好，你的生活必须更贫乏，制.度与世俗在尽可能的要方方面面掌控你~~~~~我只想说，别熬走你的锐气，多读书多认识这个世界吧！！
对于痛苦越来越惧怕，不过我知道自己不能活在国泰民安的自我麻痹里
真相大概从警察说出犯人越狱的时候就知道了，但是丝毫不影响观看。
“一个人是否值得尊重，不在于他有多少才能，而是取决于他用才能去做什么。”印度版辩护人，能拍出这样的电影，值得尊敬！
又哭了。1.5倍速加快进差不多。一度惨得看不下去。给五星真的不是因为政治正确。
少一星给过于过分的主角光环，4星给黑暗里的勇敢斗士。死也不认罪的拉贾坎努，只为丈夫寻求正义的妻子，智商在线正义感又爆表的人权律师，还有那些虽然陷落贫困却不失勇气的部落人，每一个，无论是有大大的力量还是小小的坚持，都无比勇敢，让人愿意在这世界上继续。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
