The history of Danish country church architecture is told by showing scenes of how the church was used by the congregation, beginning with the celebration of mass in a small and simple wooden church 800 years ago, and ending with the congregation singing in a village church of to-day. The development and the growth of the pattern of church architecture is shown.
Dreyer in this film shows a series of churches from different periods with churchgoers in period clothing. Each period is separated by a shot of a church bell double-exposed on the sky. Although the film has a vibrant and instructive way of communicating the different epochs and styles to students, it does not exhibit the artistic quality that usually distinguishes a Dreyer film, except perhaps in some of the costumes, which were originally made for Day of Wrath.
The board of Dansk Kulturfilm in autumn 1945 decided that their planned church film would exclusively be about village churches. Dreyer would rework the script that was written by editor and folk high-school principal Bernhard Jensen, aided by a committee of experts consisting of architect H. Lønborg-Jensen and Victor Hermansen, curator at the National Museum of Denmark. Dreyer had a first draft ready in mid-March, entitled Kirken er et gammelt Hus ("The Church Is an Old House"), which was distributed to the members of the committee for their comments.
In the last half of July, Dreyer and Victor Hermansen travelled the country to look at suitable churches. They researched the details and at Dreyer’s request a number of technical changes were made to the churches, including the removal of porcelain holders for electrical wiring in Tveje Merløse Church.
On 4 July, Dreyer went in advance to Ringkøbing. Shooting was set to start a few days later with the arrival of the director of photography, Preben Frank, who had fallen off a ladder and broken his leg, Fortunately, he was ready to cautiously start working again within a few days, with his leg in a cast.
Otherwise, the production went without a glitch. Everywhere, Dreyer said, they were well received at the vicarages and they had no problem getting enough extras. On 1 august, they returned to Copenhagen with almost all their footage in the can. They only needed to film the church in Skelby, where the weather had been against them, plus a Swedish wooden church in Hedared. The economy was distressed so soon after the war, especially when it came to foreign currency, but there were no real wooden churches left in Denmark and building an interior set in the studio would be too expensive.
The finished film was shown for the first time on 24 September 1947 to a small, closed circle, which included the Minister for Ecclesiastical Affairs. In December 1947, as was Dansk Kulturfilm’s standard practice, the film was presented to the press, politicians and others on a programme with four other short films.
真实事件改编也是不了了之……
真实事件改编，中规中矩，节奏稍微有点儿慢，事件本身确实让人很震惊，这么大的事儿居然差点儿搞不定！当然也有可能，当前疫情这么严重不也有阳性了还瞎跑嚯嚯人民群众的，不制裁你们丫的真说不过去！！！
虽然改编一般，但you will be found一出来，我就破防了😭
大概是之前看到太多差评，我把预期值降到了最低再去看，反倒觉得好像还可以，可以给到三星半，如众多网友说的，ben platt的造型要演高中生实在勉强，但音乐真的无敌，之前已经听过无数遍you will be found跟so big so small，再次听仍然会有头皮发麻的感觉，电影版里alana会更具体，而且结局在保持原版的基础上，增加了evan对connor生平的追寻，最后conner的video大概算是给connor一家的救赎吧。
这么好的题材，怎么就被拍得那么普普通通...
拍的一般，浪费了题材，话说同样的情节，中国也可以拍个三聚氰胺版本
故事本身的立意很好，但是电影版拍摄手法实在是让人看得尴尬……突然唱歌（甚至有些地方并不好听）真的不适合放在电影里，结尾也挺突兀的。或许音乐剧原版的会更好吧
🇰🇷真的属于一边讽刺财阀，一边拿着财阀的💰拍电影。。。但不得不说嘲讽和真实，🇰🇷电影真的可以！
韩国至少还有部叙事电影 天朝恐怕反倒要把你投入大牢
怎么说呢意料之中的结局吧，总感觉是看过的情节大纲
取材于现实的故事，原本可以跟素媛、熔炉差不多，却因为拍得跟电视剧差不多而泯然
权利交易，前官礼遇，美籍至上，集体诉讼。
6.5分/ B-。虽然是一贯的套路，但根据真实事件，然后又拍出来，这点就很值得点赞。
老太太病床上的女儿，有水俣病那味了。
有一些现实意义，但在韩国一众电影里就显得很一般了。
中规中矩，听过很多up解说过这件事，艺术加工过的内容自然没有事实具有冲击力。
和小伙伴们一起看剧可太快乐了，it’s been too long. 男主的声音一飘出来隔了那么多年还是一样好听，音乐里承载了丰沛的情感，在不太阴沉的日子里应该会常翻出来听。以及想去看现场！
七分应该有的，真实事件改编题材好，剧本和演员差点。结局挺震撼的，揭露黑心企业的同时也讽刺了政府人员的黑心交易。直面现实的勇气是韩国电影的可贵之处。
挺平庸的一部电影，节奏是很传统的韩式商业电影，细节经不起推敲，适合看一次下饭（如果是十年前拍的电影可能会给高分）
根据大韩民国真人真事改编，题材还是蛮震撼的。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
