Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
5.0分，女主表演不错，反一有些拉胯，反二还ok，故事中规中矩，夜戏部分曝光没做好，耐于小成本，继续努力
感觉女主磕了药才战斗力翻倍的，所以。。。然后内什么，车里藏一个螺丝刀能救命啊哈哈
意外的还不错，而且女主长得很漂亮，是我喜欢的那种。
这是干啥呢啊？动作和惊悚？惊悚搞哪呢？惊悚拍丢啦？
暴雪封路，困境逃亡，谁是凶手，这种题材就算拍了千百遍，也仍会肾上腺素飙升…钉枪打入手腕的那一刻，光是不自觉想象的痛就让手心出汗了…
我只想知道，玻璃门是什么时候烂的？还有为什么不是白人女主？而是一个亚裔而且演技奇差！
以为是女主专场，被bangbang的时候还是心疼了一下！片子拍的挺好的！希望女主🔥起来。女主，华裔！！！
第三个赞叹是女主的冷静勇敢聪明，全程智力在线。不会有多余的害怕拖拉，也不会有超乎神力的反转，活下来完全是凭借自己的智力。
哈哈哈哈哈哈哈笑死了，今年最佳，我爱间谍/特工/杀手类误会喜剧
死得都挺惨的，看着揪心，暴雪+休息站题材百试不爽
小成本暴风雪山庄，人物少、场景简单，故事不啰嗦，反转也是预期中的效果，整体仍然是套路中的惊悚电影。
真心不错，小成本虽老套但有吸引力，女主角演技很棒，也很耐看，越看越漂亮那种，比目前最后的一些亚裔演技要好，看好她。
6.1/10电影完成度还是可以的，节奏也很紧凑，故事比较饱满，但太多细节经不起推敲，逻辑不通，很多不符合常理的地方，尤其是最后女主当着警察面开枪那里，简直拉垮。夸一夸女主演技吧，还是值得加一星的。
老实说看多了悬疑电影，看谁都感觉有问题！中间的反转给我的感觉就很平静，以至于还有2分钟就结束了，我感觉还有反转呢！整体作为悬疑电影真的紧张感不足，好在演技不错，其实要影片的内核更像是表现自我救赎，找到出口。
处处被困处处封锁，很好的把“no exit”这个概念延续到底，困在戒毒中心、困在暴风雪中的游客中心、困在车里被绑架的小孩……
被长发小哥蠢哭，你不死谁死，还死得这么草率哈哈哈哈哈哈。至于最后的惨剧完全是女主一手造成的，绝了。但很喜欢女主的厌世脸。
演员很在线，故事节奏、构图画面和音乐都调控的很不错，后半部分高潮迭起，善最后战胜恶，虽剧本是老套路，但效果已经很不错了
对于密室类来说似乎单调了些，猜凶手的悬念不够，拔钉子有点《电锯惊魂》。结尾没明白，难道一切不是女主在戒断交流会上看到那幅雪山油画的想象吗？？？
暴风雨山庄模式的经典套路，看多了，只能给6分
断断续续看完导致剧情在脑子里不连贯，印象中没有特别搞笑的桥段，打戏也一般，只能评价还行。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
