剧情介绍

  Daniel Mays (Line Of Duty, Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, Public Enemies) stars in BBC Two's powerful factual drama as Peter Wildeblood, a thoughtful and private gay journalist whose lover Eddie McNally (played by newcomer to television, Richard Gadd), under pressure from the authorities, turned Queen's evidence against him in one of the most explosive court cases of the 1950s - the infamous Montagu Trial.
  More than ten years before the decriminalisation of homosexual acts in 1967, Peter Wildeblood, and his friends Lord Montagu (Mark Edel-Hunt) and Michael Pitt-Rivers, were found guilty of homosexual offences and jailed.
  With his career in tatters and his private life painfully exposed, Wildeblood began his sentence a broken man, but he emerged from Wormwood Scrubs a year later determined to do all he could to change the way these draconian laws against homosexuality impacted on the lives of men like him.
  Daniel says: 「I'm incredibly proud to be part of a drama that tells such an important real-life story. Peter Wildeblood is a fascinating, complex, yet flawed character from a time when being a gay man in Britain was incredibly difficult - I can't wait to bring his tale to life for the BBC Two audience.」
  Patrick Holland, Channel Editor, BBC Two, said: 「50 years ago, it was a crime to be a gay man in the UK. Against The Law is a stunning piece that melds drama and documentary testimony to tell the story of one man, and his wider generation, as they struggled to make society accept their sexuality as non-criminal. It is brilliant to have a film that brings the authorship of Brian Fillis, the vision of director Fergus O'Brien, and the outstanding talent of Daniel Mays and cast to this important subject」
  The drama also features Mark Gatiss (Taboo, Sherlock) as Wildeblood's prison psychiatrist, Doctor Landers and Charlie Creed-Miles (Ripper Street, Peaky Blinders) as Superintendent Jones.
  Woven through this powerful drama is real-life testimony from a chorus of men who lived through those dark days, when homosexuals were routinely imprisoned or forced to undergo chemical aversion therapy in an attempt to cure them of their "condition". There is also testimony from a retired police officer whose job it was to enforce these laws, and a former psychiatric nurse who administered the so-called cures. All of these accounts serve to amplify the themes of the drama and help to immerse us in the reality of a dark chapter in our recent past, a past still within the reach of living memory.

评论:

  • 妍晨 3小时前 :

    5⃣️被忽视的女性情绪、被忽视的边缘诉求唯有通过暴力才可以解决吗?结合时事 不寒而栗

  • 孔鹏池 5小时前 :

    女性当上总理,依旧会被越权,被试图当成傀儡,多么可笑。只有印度女儿,才能为印度女儿呐喊,多么可悲。

  • 博韦 9小时前 :

    影视工作者也在用自己的方式表达

  • 卫青 8小时前 :

    电影存在的意义大于电影本身,就电影自身品质来说,还欠打磨。(2022.4.6豆瓣7.8分)

  • 嘉恒 2小时前 :

    6.5分。又是这种立意很好,但完成度不足的片子。着眼女性权力是好事,但用孩子做人质的那一刻,其实她所有的诉求都已经没有意义了。还玩什么总理当面交谈之类的鬼话,整个后半段几乎完全不知所云。不是你出发点好,你所作的所有事情都能被接受的,感觉就从没人真关心过这点。

  • 凤春柏 2小时前 :

    刚刚二月,印度就已经释出了「年度天花板」级别的电影,这真是让接下来十个月的宝莱坞「亚历山大」呀。剧情离奇(虽有抄袭《3年A班》立意之嫌)、节奏紧凑、开门见山,不冗长不拖沓无歌舞,代入感强,挖掘深刻,表演精湛,尤以台词设计异常出色。主题依旧是印度人对于整个社会体制的「反思」与「自检」,抽丝剥茧的叙述,真相也依旧让人不寒而栗。牢牢锁住四星,看今年的印度电影,还有哪部能超过它。

  • 庚旭东 9小时前 :

    看介绍推广文章时居然被剧透了,😵。所以没有多大悬疑反转的地方,可惜了。

  • 仝以蕊 7小时前 :

    不能认同电影的高分,但太能理解这片土地民众借由社会热点电影发声的举动。我说的是哪片土地你知道吧

  • 孙越泽 9小时前 :

    有社会问题 有承载社会事件的媒介 就是没有电影

  • 弥承平 3小时前 :

    星期四 是印度最缺的类型片。电影按类型片流程一步步走下来,最后喊了句口号,技术上没有什么惊喜。也没有太多的本土化,背景放印度放美国都一样,无非台词说哪种语言而已。过于规矩,就算带上小朋友和孕妇,也没有特别触动的地方,结尾喊的口号因为太跳,铺垫不够,抱歉,出戏了。

  • 婷琛 6小时前 :

    她挟持了16个孩子但没有伤害过他们 孩子们什么都不知道甚至任何恐慌情绪都没有。她勒索了政府五千万卢布 全捐给了受伤者自己一分没留。她把自己的伤口扯开给世人看 被大家咒骂被误解成抑郁至病的疯狂人士。她要什么?她希望强奸犯可以得到惩罚 她希望那些坏人不要再逍遥法外 她希望可以让全印度的女性能拥有一个安全的生活环境 仅此而已 仅此而已 仅此而已。希望其他国家也能借鉴一下这个意义重大的星期四 不要让提出那么为广大人民着想的途径变得那么极端卑微。

  • 嘉静 6小时前 :

    强奸,灵魂杀戮;杀人,肉体毁灭。

  • 季修为 6小时前 :

    片尾字幕惊心动魄,整体可以更紧凑一些,但印度片是不是没俩小时不让上

  • 夏高扬 0小时前 :

    对于印度人敢说敢干这件事,我是服气的。一方面,他们什么都敢干,另一方面,他们还真的什么都敢干。

  • 明嘉庆 2小时前 :

    一个半小时后才知道发生什么,两个小时后才是真相,印度妇女太不容易了,要靠这种方式才能引起重视,悲哀。。。

  • 妮梅 8小时前 :

    失职的警察,冷漠的旁观者,毫无悔意的强奸犯,拿起枪械的受害者。是时候醒来了。

  • 初惠 8小时前 :

    一个女人需要孤身奋战、耗尽一切才能换来少得可怜的话语权,而现实要比电影黑暗得多,片尾字幕印象深刻,在观看这部影片的两个小时内,就有8位印度妇女被强奸,同为女人、同样身处亚洲,对于这种恐惧十分感同身受。看之前以为会很类似《裙角飞扬的日子》,看完发现探讨的问题确实不同,题材很好,可惜的是拍得一般,制造悬疑氛围用力过猛,几处镜头+音效真的很印度,废镜头废戏一堆,高潮来得太晚,立意大于影片本身。

  • 仵依波 8小时前 :

    70/100 放在印度的语境下,社会意义远远超过了影片本身,她是中国的药神,是韩国的熔炉,是社会阴暗面一个呐喊的突破口;她也更是理想主义的——所有进展都在计划之内,所有要求都能被满足,更是撼动了法律,反观现实世界,又是多么的无助。

  • 斛秋珊 0小时前 :

    印度版《误杀2》。依然是一个用非常规手段寻求正常自我诉求的故事。女主绑架了幼儿园小朋友,目的是希望把强奸自己的人绳之以法。值得注意的是,电影里很多女性角色都对女主充满了恶意,特别是要求强攻的女警官。这一点很现实,和我国的情况相似。剧情上没什么特别的地方,最后能与女总理见面还是比较扯的。而且应该有技术手段屏蔽一整个区域的网络信号吧,虽然通过直播增加影响力还是挺与时俱进的。男警察也太像泰国人了。

  • 回初柳 2小时前 :

    可怕的現實…但實際上不以暴制暴根本無人在意…

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved