Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
还可以的，女主演技不错，药包的铺垫真的不错，拿出来那么多次，最后终于用上了
我们的爱最新鲜，保留原味，浅尝一遍闭上眼情绪特别…真应该找梁咏琪给这部电影唱主题曲。
今年很多男人不靠谱做工具人的大女主女拳片啊。
seb老得……啧啧啧，一脸的沟沟壑壑，阴影打下来活像蜘蛛侠的滑板博士绿魔
“女人的味道更好。”太多明显的比喻，女权主义爽片。
384看起来这么可爱超sick的~
如果现在还有人把浪漫邂逅—“你很特别”-高大帅气玛丽苏当做fantasy就可以看看这个
纯良女子遭遇斯文禽兽，深宅囚禁，密室逃脱。老套得不能再老套了。为了政治正确凑齐了白黑亚裔印第安人，中断过后反派智商断崖式下滑，竟然还是个情种，这怎么对得起冰箱里的那一堆残肢断臂。想博取变态欢心和信任，光吃两餐人肉还远远不够，好歹得让女主角亲自烹饪她的黑女朋友，大快朵颐一番才算入门哇。
202nd 血腥画面不多，靠剧情推动，不错
把你关在猪圈里，一点一点吃掉你，手脚耳朵舌头乳房，火腿，刺身……极度不适！Woman tastes better。女人尝起来更美味！yk掉你的阴茎！！You are not fking stupid.It is always their fault!
5.0“好胸不怕晚”好家伙，咬jj……
打发时间还可以喔，比想象中看得下去，女主长得好漂亮，像文艺版的安妮海瑟薇。
题材不错，中间略显枯燥，不过整体还可以。塞巴斯蒂安好帅！😍
❗️单身女谨记：
节奏还不错。玩牌时候想起来希区柯克的桌下有炸弹说。这种玩法我以前也玩过。黑大叔好人脸。大妈的反转挺难解释的。女主一般般。
很惊喜很好看啊，全员演技在线，关于男性的槽点简直精准到想鼓掌，包括那条写着直男审美四个大字的粉色连衣裙🎀为全片最酷姐妹那句“小美人鱼这个蠢货居然为了一个男人放弃了整个大海”加一星～
真 暴风雪山庄模式，小成本密闭环境，想法非常好，暴风雪遇绑架犯，经典四选一，但是悬疑氛围制造的太差了，剧情不够紧凑，反转也不够明显，只能说导演功力不够…..不懂为什么短评都在夸女主，虽然是亚裔但是演技真的撑不起这个大女主，完全被两个绑匪的演技秒杀，开头和结尾完全看不出心态转变，那么紧张的环境下听到妈死了也面无表情…个人觉得换个女主反而会gebgchucai
60/100 美术不错。导演的野心不足致使其沦为平庸的轻喜剧。
期待的血浆四洒的镜头一个也没有，过于克制的恐怖片
作为一个讲食人魔及其背后产业链的电影，倒没什么特别血腥的镜头，有些画面甚至拍得很美，却能让人感到极度不适，女主表现不错，牙口真厉害，冬兵演起变态也像模像样的。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
