Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
本质上是非常单纯的血浆片，女主全程抽大了的状态演得不错哦，但是这个拍摄形式我个人是不太行，第一我太晕了，第二这个除了沉浸感，我真的看不太懂在发生什么。但这个的片尾彩蛋，历史最佳好吧，，把剧情全剪了给我这个彩蛋，我能看 90 分钟
本来打四星，彩蛋一出五星无争议。压力太大的伙计们快来看这个解压，女主角实在太带劲儿了，英式的很彻底。几个高光镜头也够黑够邪，受够了这个操蛋的世界，来听主角说一整部电影的脏话吧，Motherfucker.
石盒子里的怪物很惊艳，女主亲戚虽然不喜欢她，却还是让妻子给她衣服还为了救她而死，可惜的是最后女主没有逃出去，她也被怪物吃了，后面的复仇都是死后的梦境。
三星半，女主前半段也太惨了……Cleveland怎么回事啦
1.剧情大杂烩，吸血鬼、邪教、怪物一通乱炖，没有任何前因后果的交代；
7/10非常不错恐怖电影气氛剪辑很到位，通过墨西哥非法移民女孩在美国恐怖经历展现本片主题，美国就是一个弱肉强食的地狱，想在此生存活下来都不是一般人可以做得到的。
前面十多分钟有点无聊，但是十多分钟左右正片才开始，还不错，恶心大尺度，满嘴脏话，不知道小女孩是被邪教搞了什么鬼
除去“那些”不谈，这片也属于horror伪纪录片里不错的那一类了，只是晃的比别的厉害，也没有讲angela到底怎么回事，完全的第一视角经历，所以比较短，正片一共才68分钟而已，之后有8分钟的rap片尾字幕这个很神奇，弹幕里的中文好好笑啊
就算是伪纪录片也不能晃的啥也不是吧，主角真欠揍……但片尾曲挺有新意
故事讲得不太好，但是最后的怪物形象觉得可。本来以为引恶为战，结果是因恶而生。怪物的力量滋养恶人的欲望，欲望无尽杀戮不停。弑父杀母者堕无间地狱，谁说不是呢，她再也出不去了。
人类=混乱邪恶 魔鬼=守序邪恶 总之 魔鬼就不行
前半段的铺垫节奏有点慢，最后女主是黑化了吗？
说实话挺好看的，一部不错的圣诞暖心电影。笑死
前面太拖沓了，属于越看越窝火类型…结局拉回来一星
啥意思 只要不被幻境困住 怪物就拿你没办法是吗😂很遵守规则的怪物 结局还是蛮爽的
女主演技和节奏都不错，怪物的造型有什么讲究？被献祭的人必须先投降（留下），女主意志强大或者说是合适的继任者，最终和外面残酷的世界比起来，这里她是老大～嗯～
怪物昆虫与血肉融合的质感太惊艳了，蝶翼幻化为赘皮，两条蜘蛛般的后肢连接着巨大的手掌，干燥的抚摸有种诡异的温柔，当她站立于女主上方时，身下的嘴垂落黏液，仿佛要吞噬一切，又仿佛一切皆由她分娩。
【2.0】和《夺命连线》一样用力过猛。既然影片设定是一场疯批、低俗又叛逆的直播秀，类型片场景、气氛和桥段设计就完全不必做得so serious。导演最大的问题即在于他只会堆猛料，不会做取舍，连幽默感都在使着一股劲儿，生怕观众看不出来电影好玩在哪里。
我还挺喜欢这怪物的设计，不过它好弱啊，不敢吃作恶的人，只敢吃普通的人，居然还能被女主弑母的狠劲吓回箱子里。所以这部片表现的其实就是一个“弱肉强食，适者生存”的主题吧？怪物会让自己不敢吃的恶人来为自己服务，房东的父亲不知道是因为什么恶行被箱子怪选中的，房东的哥哥是因为弑父被选中，女主则是弑母。但它又能给予他们什么回报呢？治愈身体的伤和疾病吗？房东的哥哥的确是有难以治愈的病，房东也说过他没有钱给哥哥看病，这个好处对他们兄弟确实有吸引力。可是女主需要的是钱啊，是在漂亮国过上优渥的生活啊，她又不是偷渡来美国看病的，这种水平的交换条件能吸引得了她替怪物抓猎物吗？
后面邪神露真身造型够野还挺克苏鲁，喜欢
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
