A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
达妹的表演还是挺喜欢的 只是男主似乎没有男主的气质 没有看过原著中途差点以为男二才是男主...
还8错。恶搞前作。看的生肉。该杀就杀度4/10分，主角聪明程度5/10及格，血腥度5/10及格。
感觉还行，整体还是不错的，感兴趣的可以去看看
Never trust a ten. （三星给原著和女主颜值和Birdy）
韦斯·克雷文泉下有知，估计也不会对这部新版太过失望。杀手和多处情节有致敬原版第一集的设计，遍布浓郁的迷影氛围。甚至借片中年轻角色之口嘲讽好莱坞当下大量的“翻拍”和“重启”，并分析出最流行的创意模式，奇妙地与本片情节产生互动的元电影概念。创作者在调和与迁就新老影迷的口味上已经尽力了，最感动的要数几位元老级角色再度登场时，昔日的美好回忆不断涌现，堪比《老友记》的主演多年后重聚。事实上，我当年就觉得莫妮卡在这部片里演得毫不逊色于她在《老友记》里的表现！
三星半。尽管传闻惊声尖叫6已经在筹备中，我仍希望这个系列到此结束。杀手身份泛化到和Sid毫无关系的纯影迷，编剧无疑是编不下去了。Dwright以智商下线的方式率先祭天，铁三角的回归注定是最后一次，而存活的双女主流着第一部杀手的血脉，能顺理成章开启新系列的大逃杀剧情。编剧真是个小机灵鬼啊！本片充满了对第一部的致敬，不管是角色关系，还是案发地点，或是反杀方式。这种情怀事实上可以构成铁三角甚至惊声尖叫系列的完美了结。诚然，本片多次反预判，情节处处也不合理，角色想死就死，想满血复活就满血复活，近乎脱离科学范畴。但创新点也不是没有，例如片头第一个受害者终于不死了，还活到最后完成漂亮N反杀！
趣味性不输第二部的超级续作，一边自我调侃一边献上让忠粉热血沸腾的熟悉元素，和大卫·戈登·格林重塑和升级《月光光心慌慌》的方式不同，本片导演仿佛是克莱文上身，形神都是Scream本色，爽得我拍手叫绝！
PS：感觉女主角有点莫蕾娜·巴卡琳和李冰冰的合体。。。╮（╯▽╰）╭
Classic Jane Austen's girl ——聪明大方 自信独立 博文广知 特立独行 标新立异 与众不同 大龄未婚 get a romantic love story eventually.
麻绳专挑细处断，厄运专找苦命人。在哪个国家都是一样的，底层人没有话语权。
看的生气…就是虎没脑子……录音不能备份么？打火机点不着不能多带两个在带盒火柴么？推土机确实开的6，四辆警车拦不下一个推土机。就这么给判定为是自杀了………
……不得不说，这不是fleabag wannabe吗
当初第一次看这个系列的某部时被鬼怪面具吓到了。
和这几个完全没有个人魅力和存在感的新演员
不说剧情，我真不能理解英国年代剧的政治正确。女主堂哥亚裔，妹夫黑人？不觉得很奇怪么…就跟清朝剧里出现个黑人当或者白人当官一样奇怪…
如果这不算烂片，那我不知道什么才叫烂片了。这剧情也太扯蛋了。主演没一个演技在线的。姐妹二人一个比一个看着招人烦。
40/100 愚蠢且重复的杀戮、牺牲、迷影以及“尖叫”
还行啊不烂；致敬与反致敬还挺会玩梗，至于原生粉丝梗就更玩梗了
依然是令人困惑的剧情，莫名其妙的动机
不能说是多精妙的解构，但和初代的互动实在惊喜，哄老粉的重启典范！最后还来个好莱坞往事的梗真是爆笑如雷。热泪盈眶。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
