The history of Danish country church architecture is told by showing scenes of how the church was used by the congregation, beginning with the celebration of mass in a small and simple wooden church 800 years ago, and ending with the congregation singing in a village church of to-day. The development and the growth of the pattern of church architecture is shown.
Dreyer in this film shows a series of churches from different periods with churchgoers in period clothing. Each period is separated by a shot of a church bell double-exposed on the sky. Although the film has a vibrant and instructive way of communicating the different epochs and styles to students, it does not exhibit the artistic quality that usually distinguishes a Dreyer film, except perhaps in some of the costumes, which were originally made for Day of Wrath.
The board of Dansk Kulturfilm in autumn 1945 decided that their planned church film would exclusively be about village churches. Dreyer would rework the script that was written by editor and folk high-school principal Bernhard Jensen, aided by a committee of experts consisting of architect H. Lønborg-Jensen and Victor Hermansen, curator at the National Museum of Denmark. Dreyer had a first draft ready in mid-March, entitled Kirken er et gammelt Hus ("The Church Is an Old House"), which was distributed to the members of the committee for their comments.
In the last half of July, Dreyer and Victor Hermansen travelled the country to look at suitable churches. They researched the details and at Dreyer’s request a number of technical changes were made to the churches, including the removal of porcelain holders for electrical wiring in Tveje Merløse Church.
On 4 July, Dreyer went in advance to Ringkøbing. Shooting was set to start a few days later with the arrival of the director of photography, Preben Frank, who had fallen off a ladder and broken his leg, Fortunately, he was ready to cautiously start working again within a few days, with his leg in a cast.
Otherwise, the production went without a glitch. Everywhere, Dreyer said, they were well received at the vicarages and they had no problem getting enough extras. On 1 august, they returned to Copenhagen with almost all their footage in the can. They only needed to film the church in Skelby, where the weather had been against them, plus a Swedish wooden church in Hedared. The economy was distressed so soon after the war, especially when it came to foreign currency, but there were no real wooden churches left in Denmark and building an interior set in the studio would be too expensive.
The finished film was shown for the first time on 24 September 1947 to a small, closed circle, which included the Minister for Ecclesiastical Affairs. In December 1947, as was Dansk Kulturfilm’s standard practice, the film was presented to the press, politicians and others on a programme with four other short films.
世界大抵相似。抢卫生纸抢消毒液，两个人同时开视频会互相串声，以及看东京塔点亮蓝色灯光和ARIGATO。东京、巴黎，大都市又迈着步伐继续向前，但却有那么多人，永远地留在了从前的那些季节。
好看 冲突矛盾戏剧性都有 也有好多浪漫的设置 比如巴吉尔跟luna影子的亲吻 还有结尾Paola的“欢迎仪式” à celles et ceux qui ont souffert. À l’humanité solidaire.
拍出来就是一种力量，与题材相比，故事叙述不怎么让我感冒
法国疫情期间的小区隔离生活，咱们的导演们就拍不出来这么细腻的小人物的电影嘛？？？最后感动点在“向人类团结致敬”
出乎意料的好看。疫情之下，除病毒之外人类还面临着重重考验。但愿整个地球村能够如同这座小小的巴黎居民楼，以相互理解、信任与爱来共克时艰，度过难关。
一栋楼，五户人家，略带夸张不失温情有点搞笑的再现了新冠时代所有人的处境，心态，关系…哦对，欠奉中国模式。
在新冠这个给人压力的题材下，一部温馨满分的电影告诉我们，生活充满希望，病毒只是暂时，生活才是主流
我还是很喜欢原作的
故事不明不白，但阴暗又甜蜜，很有唯美主义的味道。尤其是临结尾的一幕：老师用双手剖开自己的胸膛，从那当中蔓延开无穷的黝黑枝杈；原本盛放心的部位盈着碧水，少女掬来一抔，波光在她掌间些微荡漾。镜头一转，少女不再，湖水不再，只剩一盏白花，纤弱得几乎可怜。唯有动画，才能达成这样的奇诡表现。
贴合Covid现状的合家欢轻喜剧，过年看很舒服
拍出来就是一种力量，与题材相比，故事叙述不怎么让我感冒
有时候我们总是抱怨失去很多，但也正因为有所失才会有所得。
说是长篇，其实就是个七十分钟的类似ova的短片啦
2021年底观影，补打卡。疫情让邻里间产生连接，以及由连接引发的冲突与和解。疫情带来的积极面。不同职业，不同性格的人，在面对疫情的态度各异，很生动，很后疫情时代，给人共鸣。导演饰演的神经质男人太好笑了，不愧是《欢迎来北方》的他。
结尾挺好，但中间的剧情太飞了很难收。很多桥段确实好笑，但是因为疫情并没有过去，用这个开玩笑总觉得怪怪的。
直接讲述新冠疫情生活的故事，法国人以他们所擅长的喜剧片来表现，幽默、温馨，能够触动很多人的内心。因为影片中人物所经历的一切，也在世界各个角落里上演，观者会以对这些镜头与对话，抱以会心的微笑。
“向所有受过苦的人致敬”
せんせ会思考把她送回去到底是不是真的为她好，没有一意孤行，太好了。
故事挺简单 拖得有点久 疫情下的邻里关系
年度十选。无需多言，这是只属于动画的生命力，也同样是只属于动画的谎言。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
