逻辑狗网络版和家庭版的区别 高清

评分:
9.0 推荐

分类: 记录片 1991

导演: Catherine Gale

剧情介绍

  A sharp, witty, mind-expanding and exuberant foray into the world of logic with computer scientist Professor Dave Cliff. Following in the footsteps of the award-winning 'The Joy of Stats' and its sequel, 'Tails You Win - The Science of Chance', this film takes viewers on a new rollercoaster ride through philosophy, maths, science and technology- all of which, under the bonnet, run on logic.
  Wielding the same wit and wisdom, animation and gleeful nerdery as its predecessors, this film journeys from Aristotle to Alice in Wonderland, sci-fi to supercomputers to tell the fascinating story of the quest for certainty and the fundamentals of sound reasoning itself.
  Dave Cliff, professor of computer science and engineering at Bristol University, is no abstract theoretician. 15 years ago he combined logic and a bit of maths to write one of the first computer programs to outperform humans at trading stocks and shares. Giving away the software for free, he says, was not his most logical move...
  With the help of 25 seven-year-olds, Professor Cliff creates, for the first time ever, a computer made entirely of children, running on nothing but logic. We also meet the world's brainiest whizz-kids, competing at the International Olympiad of Informatics in Brisbane, Australia.
  'The Joy of Logic' also hails logic's all-time heroes: George Boole who moved logic beyond philosophy to mathematics; Bertrand Russell, who took 360+ pages but heroically proved that 1 + 1 = 2; Kurt Godel, who brought logic to its knees by demonstrating that some truths are unprovable; and Alan Turing, who, with what Cliff calls an 'almost exquisite paradox', was inspired by this huge setback to logic to conceive the computer.
  Ultimately, the film asks, can humans really stay ahead? Could today's generation of logical computing machines be smarter than us? What does that tell us about our own brains, and just how 'logical' we really are...?

评论:

  • 度修能 2小时前 :

    米国人拍特种兵还是比较专业,开枪动作都很帅,不过故事都是相对弱化的。

  • 夕英秀 8小时前 :

    剧情太慢, 有点拉胯, 故事讲不好, 又没有特效支撑.

  • 张廖晨潍 0小时前 :

    黄金比较软,用小刀,铁锹,锤子,花点时间,敲出来几块,分解搬运出去。

  • 信振 6小时前 :

    horrible!看完头晕 听到外面猫吵架嘶喊 吓一跳。

  • 年湛芳 1小时前 :

    i can fuck zac efron all night long

  • 台玲琅 8小时前 :

    与其痴心妄想 不如脚踏实地

  • 昌慧巧 9小时前 :

    看了十几分钟,看出了脏乎乎的男主就是扎克,但故事怎么也看不进去,等到两男发现有史以来最大的一块狗头金时,就弃剧了——非典型故事,没有任何讲述的必要。其他关于人性的表现,更是扯淡,这么大的金子,人性经不起考验,也无需诸多假设。

  • 卫俊伊 1小时前 :

    剧情套路,当作爽片的话好像也不是很爽,走深刻最后又草草收尾.

  • 卫秀芳 3小时前 :

    挺好的类型片~为啥这么低分?总之我喜欢~福斯特又挂了

  • 德振 7小时前 :

    螳螂捕蝉,黄雀在后。为什么不相信姐妹花呢?我认为姐妹花比胖子靠谱。出色的化妆,乍一看以为是僵尸电影;废土生存的画风神似《疯狂的麦克斯》。澳大利亚的惊悚片总能给人带来惊喜。

  • 嬴安筠 9小时前 :

    开头司机用石头砸死了垂死挣扎即将被另一条鬣狗咬死的伤狗,就暗示此人非善类。最后蠢汉被鬣狗咬死了,司机被人射箭杀死了,故事告诉我们:我族土地上的黄金怎么能让外人随随便便拿走,要想掘金走,留下两人头!

  • 年槐 6小时前 :

    CQB细节做的很好,但是剧情缺少逻辑串联,本子是比较老套的老兵复仇…唯一比较有代入感的是对于所执行任务的目标是真的如开始所说的那样么

  • 性明杰 0小时前 :

    你当国家是信仰,国家当你是条狗。

  • 局辰宇 5小时前 :

    这么多年一直喜欢这种谍影重重调调的电影 剧情bug也明显存在 但能看出拍摄手法还是很纯熟的 感觉还有很大空间能拍续集

  • 卢梓颖 9小时前 :

    whaaaaat看完才发现居然是扎克埃夫隆

  • 南天韵 2小时前 :

    扎克埃夫隆这是要冲奖?(看眼睛预感到会是某帅哥但没想到是他)

  • 兆明辉 2小时前 :

    就没有人研究一下那个卫星电话为什么用的北斗系统嘛?

  • 宇运 2小时前 :

    男主挺帅 剧情一般 同类型题材的故事看多了

  • 姒米琪 9小时前 :

    没有太不堪。低配版谍影重重和生死狙击串烧。

  • 乐新雪 9小时前 :

    挺可怜的

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved