You are never fully liberated from Auschwitz, 11 July 2016 Author: Red-125 from Upstate New York The French movie "À la vie" was shown in the U.S. with the translated title "To Life (2014)." It was written and directed by Jean-Jacques Zilbermann. The film is a Post-Holocaust saga, although it opens with scenes in Auschwitz that are truly horrific. Hélène (Julie Depardieu) and Lily (Johanna ter Steege) were friends in Auschwitz, and they managed to survive the death march from Auschwitz to Louslau together. A third friend, Rose (Suzanne Clément) was unable to walk, so they were forced to leave her behind. As it turned out, Rose survived until the liberation of Auschwitz. The three did not see each other again until 1962, when they come together for a reunion at a beachside resort in Northern France. We learn early in the movie that Lily divorced her husband after the war, and is living as a "free soul," with no permanent partner. Hélène and Rose both married concentration camp survivors. The plot of the film--based on the lives of three actual friends--revolves around their interactions during the reunion. No matter how much ice cream they eat, and how they display their new bathing suits, thoughts keep circling back to Auschwitz. They quarrel about tiny details which they remember differently. They revive horrible memories. It's clear that the reunion will change their lives, but whether the change will be for the better or for the worse is an open question. For reasons I don't understand, "To Life" caries a terrible IMDb rating of 6.1. Fortunately, we saw it as part of the excellent Rochester Jewish Film Festival. If we hadn't had "All-Event" tickets, we probably would have stayed home. This is a movie to be seen, not missed. Ignore the rating and seek it out. It's available on DVD, and it will work well on the small screen. See it!
属于比较工整的那种冲奖片，各方面的设计都很精心考量。桑德拉布洛克的表演朴实无华，一脸的厌世相很符合角色定位。监狱内监狱外的人没啥区别——对这句台词印象深刻。
印度也开始像韩国人那样编排国家元首了。这个剧本虽然胆子很大，但故事完成度还可以，女主也相对耐看。
改编自同名英剧，混合成美式的枪支话题。如果没有枪，5岁小女孩也就不会误杀警察，落魄妈妈也就不会顶罪，也就不会母子分离，也就不会多年出狱后还要遭到警察儿子报复。这一连串的不幸，都是因为枪支随手可及。前面有点散慢无主题，后面渐入佳境，布洛克和戴维斯贡献影后演技。6.6
但整部电影拍的画面太暗了，印度人又长得黑黢黢的，2小时的观影时间看下来很费眼睛。
这剧情不意外，甚至有些狗血，但女主角的演绎和风格处理还是挽回了不少。
这剧情不意外，甚至有些狗血，但女主角的演绎和风格处理还是挽回了不少。
“自你开始观看这部电影，据统计，在印度已有8名妇女被强奸。”推动历史，需要每一位女性的觉醒和努力。
陈词滥调哈哈，Sandra Bullock一如既往的Poker face。
能铺垫80分钟还不知道到底要干嘛的谜面就像是先看了一集明星大侦探，还好女总理的一句“Emotions can be assets”和对性别刻板印象的反击总算让人觉得来了点劲。而那个关于强奸的谜底则在母亲的一句反问中完全揭晓，后面的紧张甚至和总理面谈的高潮也变成了可预见的补充。对印度社会问题和女性困境的直击，以及对女警察、女总理、女主播和母亲等女性角色的着力没能挽回叙事节奏的失衡。
我们就这样不自知地步入一个有罪恶，却无罪感意识，有悲剧，却没有悲剧意识的寒夜？无法使人更高贵，反而使人更加卑微。使人自私、猥琐、狭隘和猜忌。把人们的注意力吸引到细小的事情上面去，没有使人超越人自己本身，却使人称不上真正的人
最后的字幕:在看这部电影的期间，有8个女人被强奸。。
…果然有点失望…这玩意儿换故事男主会更牛逼…
3.5星，又一部关注印度社会痼疾的影片。重病需下猛药，印度强奸案的普发，破案率的低下以及法律的滞后，让正义得不到申张，受害者的伤痛难以平复，逼得女主不得不采取这么极端的方式来表达诉求，虽然行为不可模仿，但绝对够震撼。故事讲得还算流畅，虽然有很多其实经不起推敲的点。印度的警察难道真的这么不堪么，发生这种事不第一时间切断网络反而让“罪犯”全程网络直播引导舆论给政府施加压力，这不是自己给自己带了个枷锁么。而且过了这么久才调查清楚犯罪分子的背景以及真正的诉求，这也太迟钝啦。吃瓜群众和吃人血馒头追热点的媒体的看客嘴脸也是表现得很形象。现实中没有出现这么鱼死网破孤注一掷的女主，但希望反映的问题能得到重视，加大保护女性的权益，让女性更有安全感。
虽然故事只能是故事
题材很有社会意义，但情节逻辑上还是有不少漏洞，以女主这般被听到以及与总理见面的诉求来看，按剧情中的计划来走要成功的概率太小，不稳定因素也太多了…以及结尾实在太理想主义，现实依然充满残酷，当然电影这般美好的展现，也许也是表达一种对女性境遇改善的希冀吧。另外始终还是觉得印度电影的通病就是节奏太拖沓，并且过分煽情和戏剧化的对话和表演，会弱化整个主题的冲击性以及严肃性。
桑德拉·布洛克的人中让我出戏 剧情的高潮也没有撑起来… 是我期望太高了
初看以为有深层探讨，越看发现越平，群演让人印象深刻。。。
2个小时 八名女性被强奸 骇人听闻的高频率
以印度的这个强奸率来说，判处死刑得少三分之一的人吧🤣
对美帝无能司法的控诉真棒棒哒。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
