Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
鹿角怪物与小男孩，这个概念时不时就会被搬上银幕，质量也是just so so .
有些东西可指可点，但整体好平庸啊
倒也不是多么难看
好久没看过这么高级的怪兽片了，氛围营造一流，才5.3分？
真的好多梗太搞笑了！哈哈哈哈！尤其现在国内疫情看着觉得更好笑了，建议居家隔离观看，但是记住我们需要freedom！
立意还是不错的，但塞了一大堆东西没用好，降智桥段太多了，可惜了温迪戈神话！怪物设计还阔以
恐怖氛围营造不错 貌似还准备出下集? 期待.
导演完全没有把故事拍好，就当做是当地旅游环境宣传片好了
黑糊糊的镜头减弱了血腥感，鹿角人脸怪兽有点想法，但跟环保扯上关系太刻意。女主比男人还猛的人设略夸张。
卢卡斯和茱莉都好惨，不仅父母都死了，卢卡斯弟弟也死了，茱莉的哥哥也中招了。都没有调查清楚这个东西会不会传染就去救人，真的会杀敌一千自损八百的啊……
在豆瓣要本着三星恐怖片要多加一星的原则。。
就这？
男孩一家本来就是食人魔?那触发变身的原因呢？
虎頭蛇尾吧 開頭其實蠻好的 氣氛營造的好 越到後面就覺得可惜了
导演的审美比较在线，怪物的设定也比较新颖，雾蒙蒙的灰色调画风和小男孩的演技撑起了前半部分，但剧情较弱，结尾也太敷衍了，实属高开低走
虽然打眼一瞧不是那么靠得住，但这或许是今年最被轻视的电影之一。
影片还是让我比较失望的，早前看预告片的时候，觉得还是不错的，没想到正片的剧情这么拉跨，想说啥都没表达清楚，关键恐怖氛围还很低，这就让我比较难以接受了。制毒的爸爸在矿坑里被怪物袭击，回家后知道自己不对劲，让大儿子把自己关起来，结果大儿子把爸爸和弟弟都关进去了，弟弟也被传染。女老师发现问题后，2个警察一死一伤，怪物却在矿坑里被女老师弄死了，还把被传染的弟弟也杀了，最后女老师的警察弟弟也被传染了。总之一句话，除了一个怪物犹抱琵琶半遮面的有点意思以外，再没有任何优点了，这就确实比较LOW了。我给3星5分，删掉了！
简介里不是说鹿角恶魔么？这么简单就被一个女人给捅死了？
高开低走，前半部分真的挺吸引人的，后面被脑瘫剧情毁了，可惜了。
非常黑暗且压抑，最后一场戏氛围感营造的不错，就是这怪兽就这么简单被女主杀了?还有结尾的意思还有续集，只能期待吧!
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
